CIRCLE (The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement)
conducts research on the civic and political engagement of young Americans.
Stay Connected:
The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement

9/11 Now in Textbooks and Standards

9/11 now in Textbooks and Standards
Many states require teaching it, but textbook treatments are cursory, and state standards require only basic information
Washington State and Vermont standards more substantive

Tisch College, Tufts University, Medford/Somerville, Mass.: The attacks of 9/11/01 happened ten years ago, when a typical fifth-grader was an infant. But the attacks are now taught in American schools, along with Lexington and Concord and Pearl Harbor. They are specifically mentioned in 21 states’ official standards for social studies and described in many of the best-selling history and civics textbooks, according to a new study by Prof. Jeremy Stoddard, College of William & Mary, and Prof. Diana Hess, University of Wisconsin-Madison/Spencer Foundation, that was released today by CIRCLE at Tisch College, Tufts University. The study finds that 9/11 is a commonly required topic, but the events of that day and their context are very briefly described in textbooks. Most of the 21 state standards that explicitly include 9/11 (with some exceptions) require cursory understanding of the attacks–just a few key facts without any context.

The earliest textbooks and curricula published after 9/11/01 uniformly presented America as the victim of a uniquely devastating attack and presented rich personal stories of the victims and iconic images of rubble, firefighters, and the American flag. That approach has now shifted to more dispassionate, but very brief, descriptions. Relevant concepts such as terrorism are either not defined at all or are used in contradictory ways (as when terrorism is defined as an attack on civilians but the bombing of the USS Cole, a naval vessel, is cited as an example).

“In most of the curricula that we have analyzed, terrorism is treated as a concept that has an agreed upon and concrete definition,” said Prof. Stoddard. “In public and policy debates, there are real disagreements about what constitutes a terrorist or a terrorist attack, yet these debates are not reflected in most of the curricula and standards.”

On the whole, textbooks and most standards do not use the attacks of 9/11/2001 as opportunities for students to exercise higher-order skills such as understanding events in historical context or deliberating about controversial issues. Students are mostly expected to memorize the basic facts about the event. By comparison, many of the supplemental curricula provided by nonprofit organizations include more robust narratives and multiple perspectives on issues of controversy, such as how democracies should strike the right balance between security and civil liberties.

The authors single out some state standards as exemplary. Washington State’s standards focus on core skills and knowledge necessary for students to participate as citizens, such as being able to weigh evidence, take a position on an issue, and participate in a deliberation. Topics surrounding 9/11, such as the Patriot Act, are included as examples of contemporary issues to address in these deliberative activities.

Vermont takes a more global focus and includes human rights issues in its standard, which addresses “how different societies address issues of human interdependence.” One part of the Vermont standard asks students to analyze the impact of a current or historic event, such as the invasion of Iraq, on human rights, and another asks students to evaluate the effectiveness of attempts to foster global cooperation, such as the effectiveness of the US led coalition formed to fight terrorism.

“The 10 year anniversary of 9/11 is an important teachable moment,” said Prof. Hess. “However, simple memorization of what happened on that day is clearly inadequate. Some states have recognized this and added topics about 9/11 and its aftermath in the context of broader themes, important inquiry questions, and in a few cases, controversial political issues that students should deliberate.”

The state social studies standards that refer to 9/11 are typically long documents that require the teaching of many events and concepts from the full sweep of American history. Many teachers report that the sheer number of topics required makes covering everything impossible. “9/11 was an event of enormous significance, but we must get away from putting everything important in state standards until they are unmanageably long lists,” said CIRCLE director Peter Levine. “If we are going to list specific events that must be covered, the point should be to teach skills, concepts, or ideas rather than just requiring students to identify the event.”

4 Responses to “9/11 Now in Textbooks and Standards”

  1. how 9/11 is taught in public schools | Peter Levine Says:

    [...] 9/11 is taught in public schools Posted on September 8, 2011 by Peter Today, CIRCLE releases new research by Jeremy Stoddard and Diana Hess on how 9/11 is treated in state standards and textbooks. More than 20 states require the event to [...]

  2. Susan Says:

    Unfortunately, the teaching of 911, as is the case with most teaching in public schools these days, always seems to have a political or social engineering slant to it.

  3. Jon Says:

    @Susan:
    You are completely correct about that. It’s not enough to just present the facts, we have to be told what they mean.

  4. how to teach Sept. 11 « Peter Levine Says:

    [...] and University of Wisconsin-Madison professor Diana Hess. My organization, CIRCLE, published its study last year.  The authors tell me that not much has changed since [...]

Leave a Reply